On Mon, 09 May 2005 11:59:16 PDT, Day Jay said: > It was figured out long ago pal, the fact of the > matter is and that I pointed out numbskull is that he > should automate getting of the stack pointer like all > of the other one's do. Except the code you were penis-extender-waving around as an example of how you have to steal lame exploits you can't even fix. Figure out how to get that 1700 automated in *your* code, and then we'll talk. (I'd not get on your case about it, except that the code you posted has *more* hardcoding in it than the code you're complaining about). > It's a default value hardcoded > in..let it go. So now you're admitting it's a default value, not a hardcoded one? Whatever happened to standing up for your position? (And you're still missing the point - if it's a changeable value with a default, it's not hardcoded). > You and your gay lover can continue looking at kiddie > porn now. When all else fails, resort to ad hominem attacks. You know, with a bad attitude like that, it's not surprising that you can't get access to any better exploits to steal.
Attachment:
pgpvDIttevkzh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/