[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Re: open telnet port
- To: Andrew Farmer <andfarm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Re: open telnet port
- From: Kenneth Ng <kenneth.d.ng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:04:02 -0400
Restarting the SSH daemon won't kill processes, but overlaying the
openssl libraries with a new version will, or has, in my case. Saved
me from having to fly to the other coast.
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 08:48:21 -0700, Andrew Farmer <andfarm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 9 Sep 2004, at 06:28, ktabic wrote:
> >> Are there even any legitimate uses for running a telnet daemon any
> >> more?
> >> (That is a genuine question - as far as I can see, SSH is always a
> >> perfect replacement).
> >
> > How about, as a service to enable as you are updating SSH remotely from
> > the other side of the country to fix the most recent problem security
> > problem and need a backup system to get into the server in the event
> > that something goes wrong?
>
> Restarting the SSH daemon won't kill open sessions.
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html