[Full-Disclosure] Re: Re: open telnet port

[Dave Ewart <Dave.Ewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday, 09.09.2004 at 08:13 +0200, list@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Steve Kudlak wrote:
> >I'll ask my friend what he does as the "just don't do x"  or just get
> >rid of   x  never seems like a good idea.  If you try to connect with
> >telnet rather than ssh to that box it just doesn't go through.
> 
> getting rid of telnetd is almost always a very good idea.

Quite so, as I suggested.

Are there even any legitimate uses for running a telnet daemon any more?
(That is a genuine question - as far as I can see, SSH is always a
perfect replacement).

Dave.
- -- 
Dave Ewart
Dave.Ewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Computing Manager, Epidemiology Unit, Oxford
Cancer Research UK
PGP: CC70 1883 BD92 E665 B840 118B 6E94 2CFD 694D E370

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBQBL8bpQs/WlN43ARAr0TAJ9N340MHUdsbQV3iiW2rD4sXWNjEwCg4/wm
yh0Fe7/G58Dgu+pKoSJAtGM=
=hCDd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html