[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Internet Explorer URL parsing vulnerability

Don't forget that Microsoft EULA especially states that in no case and in no
way Microsoft can be held responsible - any attempts will simply face a nice
wall of lawyers. Lot's of them...
Truth is that actually open source software legally are better supported
(ok, I will have to doublecheck this), since when we were checking some
licenses - M$ windows vs GPL, Apache vs IIS, open source products at least
claimed that the products should work. M$ just said - piss off and be on
your own.


-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com]On Behalf Of Kristian
Hermansen
Sent: ceturtdiena, 2003. gada 11. decembri 7:15
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Internet Explorer URL parsing
vulnerability


Shouldn't M$ be held responsible dude?  The guy who discovered the flaw
didn't produce the bad code, M$ did.  If anything, M$ should be sued for
rushing the product to market.  And let the flames begin as this topic has
been discussed all too many times before.  If you don't like the idea of
"FULL DISCLOSURE", then why are you on this mailing list?


Kristian Hermansen
khermansen@ht-technology.com

-----Original Message-----
...

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html