[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean)



On Sun, 15 May 2005 12:20:25 +1200, Nick FitzGerald said:
> Stejerean, Cosmin wrote:
> 
> > I think you are going a little overboard with this kind of response. The guy
> 
> Nope.
> 
> The guy is clearly a chopper.

A perfect proof of why benign worms are a Bad Idea. I've attached the Subject:
lines from the original thread, and the current sub-thread:

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Benign Worms
Subject: [Full-disclosure] RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean)

If the *subject* line has sprouted a mutation from 'Benign' to 'Bening',
why should we trust the *entire worm* not to mutate? ;)

(And no - I do *NOT* want to hear "but I typed that one in by hand" as
an excuse or rationalization. The Subject: had a mutation. And that's all
that's important.)

Attachment: pgpAuJaB7aq3c.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/