Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

[Day Jay <d4yj4y@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah, the status may just be "kick your ass next time
I see you" too.

Can the mod please close the topic since no one has
anything to offer worth noting? None of the responses
have to do with the PWCK bug or the code not working
because it DOES WORK.


--- Brian Debottari <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> i think him using the name "d4yj4y" on his code says
> enough about his 
> status....
> 
> On May 9, 2005, at 8:46 AM, Steve Friedl wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:38:10AM -0700, Day Jay
> wrote:
> >> I stole it, but it works, and that's all that
> matters
> >
> > "It works is all that matters" is the hallmark of
> an amateur.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > ---
> > Stephen J Friedl | Security Consultant |  UNIX
> Wizard  |   +1 714 
> > 544-6561
> > www.unixwiz.net  | Tustin, Calif. USA  | Microsoft
> MVP | 
> > steve@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter:
>
http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -
> http://secunia.com/
> >
> 
> 


                
Discover Yahoo! 
Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/