[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Multiple AV Vendors ignoring tar.gz archives
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Multiple AV Vendors ignoring tar.gz archives
- From: James Eaton-Lee <james.mailing@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:20:04 +0000
Thanks for your reply! It isn't really in the interest of the mailing
list to pursue this any further, but this was addressed in another fork
of this topic :)
- James.
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 18:49 -0200, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 01:19:00AM +0000, James Eaton-Lee wrote:
>> although bz2 is released under
>> a BSD license, gzip isn't - it's GPL, and therefore any antivirus
vendor
>> would have to write their gzip code totally from scratch.
>
>I really was not going to get into the fool fight, but sometimes I
really
>get amazed by what people that don't understand an inch about the topic
>can say.
>
>In case you missed, the gzip algorithim is also avaliable on zlib,
which
>is released under the BSD license.
>
>Please take your time and do your homework next time.
>
>http://www.gzip.org/zlib/
>
>PS: If someone already pointed this to this mo... missinformed(sic?)
list
>member, please disregard my post.
>
>- --
>Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
>"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQFCC8jnpdyWzQ5b5ckRApfyAJ9DA7D0GwbuK48+5z7VDbaDfzWnIACeJwLR
>JjIIWzvF0dfHZGCLzH5zhRw=
>=pIkd
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html