[Full-Disclosure] Re: Re: mailman email harvester

["Dave Korn" <davek_throwaway@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"James Longstreet" wrote in message
news:Pine.A41.4.58.0502081019420.328944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> >   Why?  You hoping to sell it to spammers?  Obfuscating *works*; if YOU
> > break it, that makes YOU a spamming motherfucker.  Why don't you go fuck
> > yourself instead?
>
> The name of the list is Full-Disclosure.  This is like saying "gets()
> works, if you show that it's unsafe, that makes YOU an evil evil hacker."

  He's already shown the POC "To raise awareness to this issue", and I have
no complaint about that.  But to continue and develop it into an actual
usable production-level tool serves no further purpose in raising awareness
and seems to me to be crossing the line into malware authoring; it's like
the difference between writing a POC showing a bug in SQL server and writing
MSBlast.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html