[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] JPEG Virus


Well I am always careful with what comes with this list. Pretty much anything
that has come so far hasn't been "spring loaded". But if one is a "duh, uh I just
click on anything in front of me..." I mean teenaged friends kind of think I am
being a snarly old dude because I want them to label their cute little multiattachment
letters of kitty cat pictures with something. I do worry about that problem...target
something at a community, make it look like standard stuff that gets passed around
in that community and that would be a good way tp start spreading stuff.

Have Fun,
Sends Steve


Have Fun,
Sends Steve


Dave Horsfall wrote:

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Dave Horsfall wrote:



On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Joel R. Helgeson wrote:



The attached file IS INFECTED with the new JPEG virus... Or rather, it
has the malicious image that will then infect your machine.


Odd; it didn't seem to work on any of my *BSD boxes.  XV complains about
extraneous bytes and the quantizatiion (sic) table.

Oh well; it looks like we *BSD users are safe from this one :-)



Hmmm...  Not a bad night's fishing.  Two personal replies in my mailbox,
from a couple of lusers who obviously missed the difference between the
above declaration "will then infect your machine" with the obvious
correction of "will then infect your WINDOZE machine."

-- Dave

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html