Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11

[Barry Fitzgerald <bkfsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

ASB wrote:

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Where issues like this relate to the OS is in the fact that the OS
> itself shouldn't be brought down by a poorly designed app.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> And where in that article did you read that the OS was brought down by
> a poorly designed app?
>
>  
I didn't... I was reponding to a point that was made about applications 
being reponsible for system failures.

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  
>
> > Was it MS Windows that actually held the code that brought the system down?
> >    
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> The article was pretty clear:
>
> <snip>
>
> How you managed to read "OS failure" into this is rather astounding...
>
>
>  
How you manage to get up in the morning is rather astounding.

Next time, please read the thread in context.

Also, if you think that that's a detailed assessment of the problem, 
you're not too bright.

So try and think a little harder next time, and not be so abbrassive.  
You may be having a bad day (most likely due to your poor attitude) but 
don't take your own misunderstanding out on others, mmkay?

            -Barry

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html