[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11
- To: "'Frank Knobbe'" <frank@xxxxxxxxx>, <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11
- From: "joe" <mvp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:54:51 -0400
There were actually worse foul ups from poor developers using that function.
And I agree, the ones who did it weren't too intelligent or informed on what
they were dealing with. Doesn't mean that windows is a product of stupid
developers but parts of it could certainly be pointed at as an argument for
it. :o)
joe
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Frank Knobbe
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:09 AM
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 06:21, ASB wrote:
> That has nothing to do with Windows, and everything to do with a
> stupid application.
>
> ...as if stupid app developers are solely the products of Windows
environments.
No. But according to that logic it seems that Windows is a product of stupid
developers.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:
80/support/kb/articles/q216/6/41.asp&NoWebContent=1
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html