Obviously the moderator though it was appropriate, however, you did reply to more than bugtraq and at least one non-moderated list. Please be more careful where you direct your insults. The guy released a tool he though was useful, if you don't think it is, a more polite response with some background as to your opinion would have been more well received. Calling someone a "lame kiddie" whether it is true or not, doesn't serve any real purpose, and should also be removed from moderated lists. I would have much preferred to read your opinion on it backed up by some example or evidence, rather than a flame of someone who is in my opinion actually hacking and freely passing on his findings. Alpt, I for one hope you continue along any research path you see fit, ignoring flames for the useless noise they are. On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 08:23, Stefan.Laudat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Usually lame kiddie posts like this shouldn't reach the list. Old school > ARP attacks are no longer a threat in a decently managed layer 2 > network. I thought bugtraq is still moderated. Oh, Aleph1, where art thee > ? > > --- > Stefan Laudat > Networking & IT Security Manager > Allianz Tiriac SA Insurance -- Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue http://www.bsrf.org.uk [ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0x96025FD0 ]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part