[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Re: open telnet port
- To: "Mailing List - Full-Disclosure" <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Re: open telnet port
- From: "Todd Towles" <toddtowles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:37:36 -0500
Yep, call-back modem is a very good idea. But we are sliding OT. =)
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Volker
Tanger
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 9:18 AM
To: ktabic
Cc: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Re: open telnet port
Greetings!
> > > getting rid of telnetd is almost always a very good idea.
> >
> > Are there even any legitimate uses for running a telnet daemon any
> >
> [...] need a backup system to get into the server in
> the event that something goes wrong?
Install an out-band management access, e.g. via encrypted call-back
modem. This can be easily achieved via standard mgetty and inittab. This
way you have a (serial) console working if the network has gone sour -
something that can quite easily happen if managing remote firewalls...
;-)
Bye
Volker Tanger
ITK Security
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html