[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Empirical data surrounding guards and firewalls.
- To: "Michael Simpson" <Michael.Simpson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Empirical data surrounding guards and firewalls.
- From: "Yaakov Yehudi" <yakov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:33:42 +0200
While you are quite correct that AI and the marvel which is the human
body are incomparable, that does not mean that a computer may not
satisfy a dictionary definition of sentience [requirements for such
being very simple and basic indeed].
Best Regards, YY
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael
Simpson
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 12:34
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Empirical data surrounding guards and
firewalls.
having been/being a medical doctor for my sins (which must have been
many and varied) i thought i'd insert both feet in my mouth after
putting on my old pair of flameproof trousers and contribute to the
debate
sorry for continuing the slide off-topic
i'm constantly amused to see people comparing AI/tech with meat folk
don't seem to realise the awesome nature of the massively parallel
molecular (?quantum) computer sitting in their skulls/spines, or their
cat's skull/spine.
One gram of brain tissue contains so many discrete mechanisms that it
makes even modern CPU/GPUs look as though they are crude **WHICH THEY
ARE**.
-------8<snip>8-------
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html