[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Empirical data surrounding guards and firewalls.
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Empirical data surrounding guards and firewalls.
- From: "Byron L. Sonne" <blsonne@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 02:01:10 -0400
> That depends how you define sentience, but yes, humans often exhibit
> more, but only where they know to do so. The same is true of a well
> designed computer program.
Ah, no.
Computer programs (well designed or otherwise) are not, and have never
been, sentient. I'll go so far as to state that computer programs are
fully incapable of ever being sentient(1).
I'm just waiting for all the cheesy AI fanboys to start yelling at me
now, but then again, they'd probably be the same kind of clowns that
think passing the Turing Test would mean possessing intelligence(2).
Shit man, there's been mornings where I'd probably fail the Turing Test ;)
Regards,
Byron
(1) Sentient \Sen"ti*ent\, a. [L. sentiens, -entis, p. pr. of
sentire to discern or perceive by the senses. See {Sense}.]
Having a faculty, or faculties, of sensation and perception.
(2) Intelligence \In*tel"li*gence\, n. [F. intelligence, L.
intelligentia, intellegentia. See {Intelligent}.]
1. The act or state of knowing; the exercise of the
understanding.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html