[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: New paper on Security and Obscurity
- To: bruen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: New paper on Security and Obscurity
- From: Barry Fitzgerald <bkfsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:28:28 -0400
Stormwalker wrote:
<>Hi,
It wasn't the general, massive military build up, but the specific
program known as Star Wars under Ronald Raygun. The Soviets believed
that the nonsense was true and tried to fund the research to catch up
until they hit the wall. Unlike real military weapons, a fake weapon
is controlled by the imagination, so there no limits to what was
possible.
cheers, bob
Well, in all fairness, that wasn't the intent of the missile defense
network. Many people considered it a very real "weapon" and we spent
quite a bit of money on it as well.
But, the rumors of a nasty super-weapon didn't hurt in sending the
Soviet system down.
Like I said, it's never just one thing. But ultimately, it's poor
governing on the part of the Soviets that brought the Soviet Union down.
-Barry
<>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html