[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] A sucker is born every day



Anyone else sick of this?

Please stop the garbage on the list.   God knows I get enough viagra / vicodin 
shit, not to mention every flavor of netsky.

FUD sucks, so does spam, and pointless mail to a list is an easy ranking third.

Thanks.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Carolyn Meinel 
  To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 7:16 PM
  Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] A sucker is born every day


  At 05:40 PM 4/5/2004, you wrote:

    And this comes from the same person who accused schematic of the 
happyhacker days of being a crack addict - and threatening him with jail.

  Excuse me? Since when have I said that? 

  The supermarket checkout aisles are full of publications that cater to people 
who believe everything they hear or read. This email list, I would hope, could 
rise above that level except when it is really close to April 1.  I'm only 
writing this because every once in awhile I feel sorry for the gullible. If I 
were into defending myself I'd do like Martin and write these long point by 
point rebuttals. But most people are intelligent enough to figure such things 
out for themselves. 

  Actually despite his efforts, Martin does get a hugely bum rap, for example 
in that June 2000 Vanity Fair article, where Burrough failed to realize that 
Martin is a brilliant student of the dynamics of cyberwar. Unlike Vranesevich, 
who creates fake personas, Martin operates in the open. Vranesevich assumed 
Martin was being a criminal when Martin was studying the dynamics of cyberwar 
for DSIC. Most importantly, consider that Martin works for companies (DSIC, now 
it is a subsidiary of CACI) which work on "black" contracts. Hint: add up 
contracts from the Commerce Business Dialy, subtract from total company income 
as stated in CACI's SEC 10-K and you get black income. Voila!

  So Martin is unable by the nature of his work to fully defend what he is 
doing. So all these people beat up on him. How's that for unfair?

  OK, so that is just an example of how it's not wise to believe everything you 
read or hear. You look at Martin's web site and he kind of looks like a 
sleazeball, but there is a purpose behind it. And he's not at liberty to 
divulge everything. Give the guy a break. 


  Carolyn Meinel
  http://happyhacker.org
  http://techbroker.com
  505-281-9675

  "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."  - Benjamin Franklin, 1759

  Gravity...it's not just a good idea.  It's the law.