On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 11:00:35 +1300, Nick FitzGerald <nick@virus-l.demon.co.uk> said: > First, some genius (or committee thereof) decided that putting > "userinfo" data into URLs would be a good idea. This was decided > despite it generally being agreed -- as the URL RFC authors note _in > the RFC_ -- to be a bad thing from a security perspective... I'm sure the guys at 61.252.126.191 don't give a flying fornicate in a rolling donut about how it's a bad thing from a security perspective, seeing how the PTR for that IP is somewhere in KRNIC.NET controlled space. Or are we now holding scammers to a higher standard of security than the actual site admins? :)
Attachment:
pgp00011.pgp
Description: PGP signature