RE: [Full-Disclosure] CERT Employee Gets Owned

["Myers, Marvin" <MRMyers@anteon.com>]

As being one who was rightfully chastised by Kurt recently, I do believe
that this could indeed have some relevance to the FD list. If by this
mans actions, his past work could at all be suspect, then this is the
proper venue to post it. If someone of his caliber, someone who should
know the repercussions of any action taken using a computer as a tool,
is used as an expert during trial, or their technical writings used as
such, can we not realistically look at all of his past work as being
suspect. If indeed he is a pedophile, he may have overlooked other
pedophile activity in the course of his job. While I would never accuse
someone whom I do not have personal proof of illegal activity, and after
all he is innocent until proven guilty, I can understand why someone may
want to analyze and or scrutinize his past work.

Just my 2cents worth. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt Seifried [mailto:listuser@seifried.org] 
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:29 PM
To: badpack3t@security-protocols.com; full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] CERT Employee Gets Owned

Please read the list charter and stop posting junk like this. Do we know
post stories about any criminal charges brought against anyone in the
security industry? Should we also cover parking tickets?

Kurt Seifried, kurt@seifried.org
A15B BEE5 B391 B9AD B0EF
AEB0 AD63 0B4E AD56 E574
http://seifried.org/security/



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html