Re: Fwd: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source

[Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu]

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 21:12:42 -0300, Stephen Clowater <steve@stevesworld.hopto.org>  said:

> Personally,I think FD should bounce back any message with a binary
>  attachement to the poster. This is not a 0day exploit list, if you cant
>  compile it yourself, you shouldnt have the binary :)

OK.  Who on the list will 'fess up to having an *original* source to MS-Blaster?

:)

(OK, so a pointer to a website is more desirable, but sometimes it just doesn't
work as well - if it's a "We're being attacked by *this*" posting, there's no
guarantee you're still on the air when people read it.  And there's the problem
of knowing when to remove it from the website - some people might be on
vacation and not see the note till 3 weeks from now...)

PGP signature