Re: [Full-Disclosure] MSblast worm

[tom@doctorunix.com]

The version we have here does not spread to W2000 boxes until they get SP3
installed.  Then they are immediately compromised.  NT4 did not infect.

tc

Quoting Mike.Keighley@lexicon.co.uk:

> Ah, yes.  The vulnerability does indeed exist in NT.
> But with respect, what Jasper asks is whether the *MSblast worm* affects
> NT ?
> The exploit code and discussions on here seem to suggest it targets only
> 2000 and XP.
> 
> Does *this exploit* target NT successfully ?  Not that I have seen /
> heard.
> Could an exploit be written which exploits NT ?  Oh yes.
> 
> --
> Mike
> 
> Simon Glassman <simon@bsdbox.co.uk> wrote:
> > This is affecting the following machines.
> > Windows NT 4.0 server
> > Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Server Edition
> > Windows 2000
> > Windows XP 32 Bit Edition
> > Windows XP 64 Bit Edition
> > Windows Server 2003 32 Bit Edition
> > Windows Server 2003 64 Bit Edition
> > More info <snip> security/bulletin/MS03-026.asp
> 
> >> On Tuesday 12 August 2003 11:53 am, Jasper Blackwell wrote:
> >> Does anyone know if this MSblast worm affects Win NT machines,
> >> or is it just infecting 2000 and XP.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html