[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SHA-1 broken

To: "Michael Cordover" <michael.cordover@xxxxxxxxx>, "Bugtraq" <bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gadi Evron" <gadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SHA-1 broken
From: <dullien@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:39:25 -0800

Hey all,

shown that what I would've thought to be the Next Best Thing - RIPEMD
- is yet another flawed system.


As far as I know, RIPEMD-160 is unbroken, and
unlikely to be broken quickly because of the need to find
collisions for the two "separate channels". Or did they publish
a RIPEMD-160 attack together with the MD5 breaks ?

Cheers,
Thomas Dullien

References:
- SHA-1 broken
  - From: Gadi Evron
- Re: SHA-1 broken
  - From: Michael Cordover

Prev by Date: Re: NetSec Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities Resulting From Use Of Apple OSX HFS+
Next by Date: Re: SHA-1 broken
Previous by thread: Re: SHA-1 broken
Next by thread: Re: SHA-1 broken
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread